The Powerful Rings of Rob Schmidt's
"Saturn"
by Stephen Garrett
One of the standout features at this year's Los Angeles
Independent Film Festival is Rob Schmidt's dark, elegiac drama
"Saturn," about Drew, a 24-year-old man burdened with
taking care of an invalid father severely afflicted with
advanced Alzheimer's. The film measures the emotional tension
between responsibility and recklessness, as Drew resents
having to nurse his own parent and seeks pressure valves like
joyrides on borrowed motorcycles and all-night heroin benders
with his friends, always coming home in time to bathe his dad
and give him the medicine he needs to stay alive.
The taut, restrained direction of the actors and rendering
of their tortuous circumstances reveal the depths of Schmidt's
ability to tap into the truth of his subject matter in a way
that's fresh without resorting to emotional shorthand or
clichéd dialogue. What emerges by the end of the movie is
evidence of an undeniable filmmaking talent who, in his
feature debut as both writer and director, is already showing
signs of maturity.
Now in pre-production on his second feature, "Crime and
Punishment in High School," written by veteran
screenwriter Larry Gross and produced by Gross and Christine
Vachon for G2 (a division of MGM where Vachon
has a production deal), Schmidt made time to talk to indieWIRE
about his experiences as a filmmaker.
indieWIRE: Considering
its bleak subject matter, how did you get "Saturn" made?
Rob Schmidt: I made a short film of "Saturn" about
six years ago. Christine Vachon saw that at the Kobe
International Film Festival in Japan. She was the first person
who tried to set up the feature, but at that point dark films
were not in fashion. [laughs]
iW: I can't imagine
that as a short. How long was it?
Schmidt: It was about 25 minutes. It's really just
about the father and the son; it doesn't have their whole
world in it.
iW: So Mia Kirshner's
character, Sarah, wasn't in it?
Schmidt: She's in it for about thirty seconds.
"Saturn" is a pretty fast feature, about 90 minutes; but as a
short, it was a very compressed thing. It was something that,
at festivals, worked well as the last film in a group, because
it was such an intense thing.
iW: Were you always
planning it as a feature?
Schmidt: I didn't know how long that movie was going
to be. I was improvising with actors and things, and there was
a point when that short film was 50 minutes long, and people
were saying that I should make it into a feature. I ended up
making it into a short instead.
iW: How different is
it from the feature?
Schmidt: It's pretty different from the feature. The
relationship between the father and son is a concentrated
version of what it is in the feature. It's still a movie about
love in that kind of "guy" tough way, but besides that, it's
very different.
iW: How did that
tough-guy love become your focus?
Schmidt: I think there's this tacky way that
father-son stories are told. I mean, it's kind of awful and I
just felt that it's hard to make an honest story about people
who love each other. It wasn't a designed thing that I wanted
husky tough guys. But those are who those characters are
--they're guys who work with their hands and drink too much
and they're also people who love each other and, when
someone's having a hard time they try to cover for the other
person.
iW: Can you talk about
the improvisation on the film that you mentioned earlier?
Schmidt: Actually, there was always a script. As we
went along on the short, we did add some scenes and change
some scenes; and part of that was foolishness on my part. I
used my own money to make it, and I would work as a grip and
make money until I had enough money to shoot a scene. Then I
would shoot it and spend three months editing it on a flatbed.
And then I would save up money and shoot another scene -- and
that is not a good way to make a movie (laughs).
iW: Did new ideas
gestate at that time?
Schmidt: I did some shorts and some music videos,
but if you're a filmmaker and you're not making films, it's a
little painful. Actually, "Crime and Punishment' and "Saturn"
both got set up at the same time, by some freak of
coincidence; and I really wanted to do "Saturn," so we did it
first. And I really think film is a craft, and the more
experience I get the stronger the films are going to be. So
waiting six years to do "Saturn" made it a stronger film.
iW: What made you
think the LAIFF was a good place to debut your film?
Schmidt: A buddy of mine, Larry O'Neil, had his
movie "Throwing Down" at the LAIFF about three years
ago and he was really psyched about it. And [producer's rep]
Bob Hawk felt that, in light of when we were finishing the
film that this would be the very best festival at which to
introduce it.
iW: When did Bob get
involved?
Schmidt: I met him at almost the same time that I
met Christine. And they together were trying to set up
"Saturn." Both of them were trying to get money for it.
iW: Why is it called
"Saturn"?
Schmidt: I wanted it to be Brooklyn, but I wanted
Brooklyn to be a wasteland, sort of like outer space. And also
that's one of the oldest myths, of how Saturn consumes his
children. And the way Matty Libatique shot it, he did a pretty
damn good job of making that world.
iW: Was the story that
relentlessly nocturnal in the short?
Schmidt: We couldn't shoot that much night in the
short because the film stocks weren't fast enough (laughs).
It's a movie that follows in that noir tradition, where a lot
of times the best way to shoot is at night. We were shooting a
lot of that 320 stock and we were pushing it a stop, so we
could shoot on the city streets without lighting. And because
of the way that we were flashing the film, it could make this
weird spaceland look out of it. And that was one of the things
that Matty did that was so great in "Pi." Matty's
amazing at that stuff.
iW: And you grew up in
that area?
Schmidt: Yeah, my family's from that area, but I was
raised in Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania. But they weren't really
country people, and they ended up moving back. All my extended
family is in Brooklyn.
iW: What is your dad
like?
Schmidt: My dad died of a brain tumor. He was a
small-time inventor: built wind generators and stuff like
that. He was part of that Seventies alternative movement, so
those locations [in the movie] and that loft space felt
familiar to me.
iW: How old were you
when your father died?
Schmidt: I was twenty-six, but it took him a long
time to die. Four years, I guess.
iW: So this movie was
inspired in part by your experience?
Schmidt: My experience was considerably less
dramatic, but the emotions were similar, yeah. That's what I
was saying about trying to make stories that are truthful. I
think that the emotions are pretty honest in the movie, and
I'm proud of the work that the actors did in it; and in this
particular movie that was important. It's a funny thing,
because in pop music there are these incredibly dark themes
that are rendered in a beautiful and moving way, but rarely do
movies get that dark. Even independent films are a
conservative medium, and it's getting progressively more
conservative. Dark themes seem to be so taboo.
iW: If you were asked
by a major studio to make a film, would it be hard to turn
down?
Schmidt: Studio films should be studio films, and
independent films should be independent films and not junior
studio films. It depends on the subject matter. There are
studio films that are great. "The Matrix" is a really
fucking cool movie. And "Out of Sight" -- studios are
for making these kind of films. And "Crime and Punishment,"
which MGM is releasing, is in that gray area. And I will make
a film that audiences will go to see. The deal with making
films is that you try to serve your audience. But when you're
making independent films and festival films, the point of that
is supposed to be from the heart and a real experience. It
just feels that a lot of them now are people are trying to
train for a studio movie. And that's not the right thing to do
with them.
iW: So do you see
yourself working in both worlds?
Schmidt: I think if you want to make movies you care
about, then you have to go back and forth.
[Stephen Garrett is a film editor and contributing writer
to indieWIRE.]
|