Excerpts from this appeared
in the Los Angeles Times
CRIME + PUNISHMENT IN SUBURBIA
JONATHAN DEMME INTERVIEWING DIRECTOR ROB SCHMIDT
Jonathan
Demme, the Oscar winning director of “The Silence of the Lambs,” was at this
years Sundance Film Festival, where he saw “Crime and Punishment in Suburbia.”
He was so intrigued by the film that he thought it would be interesting to talk
with Rob Schmidt, the film’s director.
Schmidt,
34, a graduate of the American Film Institute, had previously directed “Saturn,”
which premiered at the 1999 Los Angeles Independent Film Festival. “Crime and Punishment in Suburbia” is
Schmidt’s second feature film.
Demme,
55, who is based in New York, spoke with Schmidt in Los Angeles by phone this
week. Here are some excerpts from their conversation.
Jonathan Demme: Rob, I saw a bunch of terrific pictures at Sundance
in January and none of them excited me more than Crime + Punishment in
Suburbia. I'm really curious about how all this started. Can you tell
me anything about the life of this movie, the creative process and the casting?
Rob Schmidt: About 10 years ago, Larry Gross wrote this script
and it sort of languished for a while. The idea was to make a B-movie high
school flick but make it secretly about God and redemption, and it wasn't until
there was the run of high school movies that people began to buy the idea of
it.
Then, at about that same time, Mark Waters, who directed
The House of Yes, handed the script off to me because he had a
feeling I'd like it. I loved it and I took it to Christine Vachon, one of the
producers of Boys Don 't Cry, and she agreed to produce it. Ellen
Barkin, who plays the main character's mother, was the first actor to come on
board and that paved the way for Michael Ironside, Monica Keena, who I'd seen
when she was very young in a tiny indie called Ripe and Vincent
Kartheiser, who astounded me in Another Day in Paradise. I was
lucky enough to cast Jeffrey Wright before he got his roles in Ride with
the Devil and Shaft. It was actually very easy to set up
after 10 hard years for Larry.
JD: What relationship does the film have to Fyodor Dosteyevski’s novel?
RS: Crime +
Punishment in Suburbia is a really loose adaptation. It doesn't have
the same characters but the theme is intact. The main character kills a
terrible person, conceals the crime, is consumed by it, suffers secretly,
confesses and in a spiritual way is reborn. It's just that it takes place in a
California high school instead of Siberia.
JD: The original
title of the movie was Crime and Punishment in High School. Why
the change?
RS: I really
loved that title and the idea was that the film would be marketed as a B-high
school movie, but a few weeks before we started to shoot, the Columbine
massacre happened and people's perception and sensitivity of "teen
violence" in this country changed. Ultimately the movie was re-titled
because the studio wanted to take attention away from the violence, rather than
explore it.
JD: You've got an
incredibly excruciating murder scene worthy of Hitchcock. This violence isn't “fun”--you
reveal the true horror of it. The movie has an "R" rating which of
course makes it a marketing challenge. Do you feel there is also a moral
challenge in the "R" rating?
RS: I feel that one of the main
themes of the film is that kids are taught that violence is a solution, but it
isn't, it devastates them. That kind of fantasizing alienates people from themselves and I thought the movie was very
responsible in the way it intrinsically portrayed violence as a bad thing. In
Italy the movie was rated "14 and over." The film board made an
exception because of the purpose of the film's violence. The violence is in the
novel, and moves into the movie. The point of the movie is that violence wreaks
havoc in every direction.
JD: I've seen some of your earlier
work, and present in that as well as this movie is a very tough, unsentimental
approach to human nature, but you also display tremendous heart and great
humanity through your characters. Is that what attracted you to Crime +
Punishment in Suburbia in the first place, a chance to bring an unflinching,
humanistic vision to the table?
RS: I try to approach movies by
loving the characters and I try to understand them as people. If they do
vicious things, I want to understand why. In particular with this movie, I grew
up in suburbia and I really hated it, I detested it.
I felt very alone there, particularly as a high school
kid. When I read the script I thought it was an opportunity to make a movie for
disenfranchised kids, and by being hard nosed about people in that world, I
hope that kids will feel like they're witnessing something they know, not some
counterfeit model of it. So really my goal was to make something for the
disenfranchised teenagers of America.
JD: Of all ages.
RS: Including
myself at 34.
JD: And even I, at another couple
decades down the line. Do you believe in God?
RS: I hope to believe more. I pray
a tiny bit in the morning and I pray at night, to say thank you. That's pretty
much the extent of the spirituality in my life. It's different in the movies,
because you can create a world where there is no question that God exists,
that's one of my favorite things about film and fiction.
JD: I understand that there was
some pressure to remove all references to God from the movie?
RS: At one point Larry Gross and I
had a "is God really necessary" meeting at the studio, but they
eventually decide it was ok. I don't know how we could have made Crime +
Punishment in Suburbia without the concept of God, because that's the
gift at the end, the blooming of faith and the chance of a new life. If the
film has a gift, it is spirituality and hope.
JD: One of the things that I loved
about the picture was that I felt right from the opening sequence that here's a
filmmaker, like Hitchcock, Fuller and Paul Anderson, who is literally
experimenting with film and making it work. Do you experiment?
RS: I always try to work with
people that love experimenting, because it's one of my favorite things in the
movies; when people take risks and do strange things. I've worked with two
really great cinematographers, Matthew Libatique and Bobby Bukowski. They were both
ready to push and pull film, put a camera on a dolly but use it hand-held and
use still photographer lenses at the risk of everything being out of focus.
This movie was the first time I got to work with sound
a lot and I discovered all these things I never realized you could do with
surround sound and rumble tracks to make the audience feel the character's
emotions. For example, there is a pep rally scene in the movie and we wanted to
create a very frightening place out of the familiar, create a world where harm
could be done to the viewer, so we under-laid elements from the Nuremberg
Rally, even a track of Hitler.
JD: Just another detail that adds
to the nail biting, popcorn munching, full tilt great experience of seeing this
movie. Thank you, Rob.